BNB vs Ethereum Name Service (BNB vs ENS)
BNB's market cap is 354× that of Ethereum Name Service ($102.42B vs $289.37M).
Over the past year BNB lost 29.51% and ENS lost 68.65%, so BNB was the stronger performer.
If Ethereum Name Service had BNB's market cap, one ENS would be worth $2,423.09, 354× today's price.
BNB vs ENS performance
| Metric |  BNB |  ENS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $769.15 | $6.85 |
| Market cap rank | #4 | #159 |
| Market cap | $102.42B | $289.37M |
| 24h volume | $674.76M | $15.31M |
| 24h change | 0.04% | 1.72% |
| 7d change | 0.63% | 2.70% |
| 30d change | 11.76% | 26.95% |
| 1y change | 29.51% | 68.65% |
| Circulating supply | 133.16M BNB | 42.27M ENS |
| Max supply | 200M BNB | 100M ENS |
| All-time high | $1,369.99 | $83.40 |
| From all-time high | 43.9% | 91.8% |
The reverse: at Ethereum Name Service's market cap, BNB would trade at $2.17. These figures assume today's circulating supply and are illustrations, not predictions.